Daaaa BULLS(hit)

You want to believe they were doing the right thing. You want to believe that hard work leads to success. You want to believe that rewarding the right attitude leads to winning. But this season, the Bulls are throwing a wrench into what every sane person believed was the only foolproof way of developing a successful organization from scratch. The Bulls had a plan, and it seemed to make sense.

1) Have patience, it's going to be awhile. You have to know going in that you aren't going to win a championship next year. When teams try to do the "one year turnaround" it almost never works, and usually ends up setting the team back even further. Look at the Orlando Magic in 2000 after making the giant free agent signings of T-Mac and Grant Hill. They rushed it, and it cost them so much money that they couldn't afford filling the rest of the 12 man roster with any semblance of talent. To this day they are still recovering. The Knicks (Jalen Rose, Eddy Curry, Zach Randolf...), the Sixers (C-Webb), and the Pacers (Dunleavy, Murphy) all have been victims of this thinking. (Side note: Notice how they are all in the East.) The '08 Celtics are expections to the rule and that's just because Kevin Garnett is involved.

2) Hire a GM that the owner will have no problems with going forward. The man must be smart, dedicated, have a plan, and have some experience with a winning franchise. John Paxson has served as an assistant coach under one of the smartest coaches ever, Phil Jackson. He was the key member of 3 championship teams: two as a starter and one as a go-to guy off the bench. He came in with a plan (to build through the draft and collect assets to eventually use toward requiring a franchise player) and started implementing that plan almost immediately.

3) Get rid of the filth. Pax started by getting rid of anything that reminded us of the Krause era. Goodbye, Eddie Robinson. Goodbye, Jamal Crawford. Goodbye, Eddy Curry. Goodbye, Bill Cartright.

4) Hire a head coach that shares the same basic principles as the GM. Pax hired Skiles, a former unathletic caucasion point guard, like Paxson, whose success as a player stemmed from his work ethic and no-nonsense attitude.

5) Draft players from successful universities/backgrounds. Pax needed to change the atmosphere as soon as possible. The work environment is often more important than the workers themselves. If you put a dumb kid in a classroom full of nerds, pretty soon that dumb kid ain't gonna be so dumb. You put an honor roll 10 year old little girl in a classroom full of drug addicted prostitutes and paper bag boys, pretty soon that honor roll 10 year old little girl will be pregnant. With that in mind, in comes Jason Williams from the '01 NCAA championship winning Duke. In comes, Kirk Hinrich from the '03 runner up, Kansas. In comes Ben Gordon, leading scorer for '04 champion, UConn. In comes Luol Deng from '04 Elite Eight member, Duke. In comes Andres Nocioni, veteran starter for Argentine Olympic Squad. In comes Tyrus Thomas, best player for '06 final four member, LSU. In comes Joachim Noah from back-to-back national champion Florida Gators.

The process was working. The team had improved. Not only could we FINALLY see the light at the end of the tunnel, but the light we saw was blinding. So what the hell happened? Why are they not kicking ass and taking names this year? Allow me to enlighten you, my fellow depressed Bulls fans.

For starters, Skiles sucked. Everyone thought this guy was such a terrific coach. "Finally, an old school coach that tells it like it is!" "It's about time we found a coach that doesn't mince words. He'll demand accountability. He'll demand that the players play the RIGHT way." Every columnist in the Chi was slurpin' this guy just because he brought a team full of lottery picks to 3rd place in a horrible Eastern Conference. Some idiots from the FLN were even mentioning his name as a Coach of the Year candidate. It was the biggest overreaction since the warden in Shawshank Redemption sentenced Tim Robbins to two months in the hole just for calling him "obtuse."

To us, Skiles seemed like the type of guy we'd want our son to play for, an old-school coach that cherishes fundamental principals. If our kid did something wrong, we could count on Coach Skiles to set them straight. Well, that probably works for high school kids. College kids, maybe. Professional athletes, puh-lease.

For some reason in Chicago, people get confused between "honesty/integrity/toughness" and "good coaching." Not that it's wrong, but it's slightly misguided. They usually coincide. But you have to be able to teach it. Skiles talked it, but he didn't teach it. One could argue this Bulls team is one of the least mentally tough teams in the league. The natural inclination of the average racist idiot is to say, "Coach Skiles told these guys time and time again. The players just didn't listen. They quit on him. They're lazy. They don't try hard. They're unmotivated." This is inaccurate. Players still played hard, or at least, as hard as could be expected. But when when you continue to lose and it becomes harder and harder to compete with better teams with more talent, one begins to lose motivation.

Yeah, I hear you all saying, "A professional athlete shouldn't require additional motivation. They're getting paid millions to play a game. What other motivation does one need?" True that, true that. But look at this way. A guy can offer me $1000 every time I run into a brick wall. And I'll do it. For the money, I'll do it. If he wants me to run hard, fine. $1000, sure, I'll run hard. But after a while, despite being motivated by the money, believe me, I'll begin to lose motivation.

That's what the losing is. It's running into that brick wall. It's taking the court every game knowing you're outmatched and you'll most likely lose no matter what level of effort you bring.

The players did begin to slack off. Yes, it's true. And every one of them will admit as much. But when Skiles was consistently outcoached and the team's game plan was constantly being squashed by average defensive teams, he was eventually going to get tuned out.

What professionals respect is winning. Period. And Skiles doesn't win. What he does is get young players to play better, particularly young guards. But big men under him have never flourished. Veterens can't stand him (J-Kidd, Jalen Rose, Antonio Davis, Scottie Pippen, Corey Blount, Ben Wallace...). In a sense, he has the ultimate "little man syndrome." He's taken stubborness to Tony Soprano-type levels. The job of a coach is to get the best out of what he's given and to win. Skiles simply didn't do that. He didn't adapt. He had a dominant low post player in Eddy Curry, who became a bust here. He had a dominant defensive shot blocker in Tyson Chandler, who became a bust here. He had a former defensive player of the year in Ben Wallace, who became a bust here. He had a freak of nature athlete in Tyrus Thomas, who is on his way to becoming a bust here.

The average fan sees these players underachieving and thinks it's all their fault; that they either suck or they don't play hard. Not the case, people. Skiles disregards the big man on offense and puts them in lose-lose situations on defense. He allows his guards to gamble on defense and expose the big men to penetration. (Ever wonder why Tyson was always in foul trouble? Ever wonder why Big Ben had no impact? Look at the lack of help from the guards, who consistently hung them out to dry.) Both guards, Kirk and Lil' Ben, are too small to be playing significant minutes. You can't start two undersized shooting guards in the backcourt and expect to be defensively efficient. Offensively, Skiles insisted on these ridiculous drive and kick scheme that allowed the guards to jack up a disgusting amount of jump shots from the perimeter. Decent defensive teams began to stick with their men instead of collapsing on the penetration. Pretty soon, last year's open 20 footers turned into contested 20 footers. It was Skiles fault. He didn't adapt. He didn't use the weapons at his disposal. He didn't get the best out of his players. He didn't coach and he didn't win.

He routinely gave Kirk Hinrich 35 minutes a game this year, even though Captain Kirk brought less and less to the table. If anything he took things from the table. He was a bus boy, really. His turnovers, poor shot selection, and inability to run the offense all contributed to maybe the biggest key to this team's lack of success: no floor leader. We don't have one player capable of yelling, "Lu, get your ass on the block. You're 6'9'' damnit. The guy whose guarding you is 6'5''. What the hell are you doing on the perimeter?!" Or, "Noc, if you jack up one more 3 with a man in your face when your 10 times quicker than the opposing team's four and can easily take him off the dribble, I'm going to fly to Buenos Aires and screw your wife." Gordon never speaks up. I'm not sure if Luol even knows how to talk, I've never heard him say a thing. Noc doesn't speak English. Tyrus and Joachim are too young, I guess. It's the defacto point guard's job to take charge. Kirk didn't do that.

The players didn't trust their on-floor leader. They definitely didn't trust their coach. And that brings up Pax. The players lost their trust in him as well. It began last year when Tyrus Thomas was fined $10,000 for his comments regarding the slam dunk contest. Most people remember it as the immature Thomas saying he'll go just to collect a check. Then Pax fined him. Truth is the NBA had been late in the process of selecting the slam dunk contestants, giving the finalists very little time to plan and work on the dunks they would use. The four finalists each receive a check from the NBA no matter the outcome of the contest. After the late selection, all Thomas said was, in a joking manner, "I guess I'll go there to collect the money." Then a huge deal was made out of it. Fans called him a spoiled athlete. And Paxson, fearing bad press, decided to fine his rookie $10,000. It was unfair and disloyal. That may have been the beginning to the downfall.

The following offseason's trade rumors and contract negotiations didn't help. Pax waited to the last minute to offer Lil' Ben and Luol Deng new contracts, and when he finally did, they were both in the, "Take it or leave it" category. This is simply not the way you deal with the two best players on your team. Then, to add insult to injury, he waited till several weeks into the season to squash any trade rumors involving any of the players.

Fans said the players should be professional and play through it. How would you like coming to work everyday for month after month, wondering if today is your last day? It wasn't very condusive to winning games and it certainly wasn't condusive to building trust between players and management.

You can even go so far back as Paxson's decision to trade Chandler. Tyson had been one of the hardest working players on the Bulls, the anti-Eddy Curry. He was a fan favorite as well as a locker room favorite. But because he didn't fit Skiles plans, he was traded for P.J. Brown and J.R. Smith. Smith was let go within days. The plan was to use Brown in a trade for a big name player, a trade Pax was too conservative to pull the trigger on. We look back now at how little Memphis asked for in return for Pau Gasol from the Lakers, and as LA just wrapped up home court advantage throughout the playoffs in the most competitive conference in NBA history, we realize Pax effed it up.

In the end, the blame lies mostly in the lap of management. The easy thing to do is blame the players; to accuse them of being lazy, unprofessional, and immature. Amazing! These are the same players from fantastic backgrounds who never once in their lives have had their character questioned. They were thrown into an unprofessional environment, and pretty soon they began to act unprofessional. That's the truth.

The Great Race of '08

From my omnipresent standpoint, the 5 real contenders are, in no particular order: Tim Duncan, Lebron James, Chris Paul, Kevin Garnett, and Kobe Bryant. Guys like Carlos Boozer, Brandon Roy, Dwight Howard, Baron Davis, Steve Nash, Dirk Nowitzki, Chauncey Billups, and Tracy McGrady have all had their names mentioned as well. Allow me to shut them down one by one.

Boozer, despite being a top 25 player in the league, can't be the true MVP of the league if he isn't even the most valuable player on his own team (Deron Williams). Brandon Roy was getting slurped by all the critics when the Blazers went on that mid-season winning streak. Now that the team is coming back to their senses, so are all the critics. Dwight "Superman II" Howard is a monster, and the 2nd best center in the game behind Duncan, but turnovers, inconsistency, and playing with a below average point guard in a below average conference hurt his chances. Baron Davis didn't even make the All-Star team, plus many say Stee-Jack is the heart and soul of that team. Nash's defense (or lack there of) is finally beginning to be discussed openly. He gets 20 and 10 dropped on him too consistently from the top ones in the West (Paul, D-Wil, Baron, Tony Parker, etc). Dirk Nowitzki could have averaged 32, 14, 6, 3, and 3 this year, and the league would still have refused to give him the back-to-back after he took it like anal queen Taylor Rain from Stephen Jackson and the Golden State Warriors in last year's first round.

Chauncey "I have the goofiest name ever and nobody seems to realize it" Billups suffers in the same way that Boozer does. Most people don't know it, but Rasheed Wallace has been the most valuable player on the Pistons since he's gotten there. Very few players can score inside and out, play both front court positions on both sides of the floor, and guard the opposing team's best big man without fouling. Proof of his value lies in how smoothly the Pistons transitioned after losing Ben Wallace two years ago. Better proof lies in how when 'Sheed flipped out like a drunken homeless man clearing out a late night burrito joint in last year's playoffs against The Lebrons, the Pistons promptly tanked. Chauncey drives that team, but 'Sheed is the backbone.

The darkhorse is T-Mac. Allow me to go out on the limb here and say that if McGrady had never had these recurring back issues and ever had a chance to play with a great coach earlier in his career who demanded his accountability at the defensive end, we might be talking about him in the same light as we have the Kobe's, Duncans, and KG's over the last 7 or so years. A 6-8 terror who could score from anywhere, was practically unguardable, and could jump out of the gym. He still drops 22, 6 and 5 consistently, but you can literally see the strain in his eyes as he rises to the basket on a drive and can barely get a runner up and over a shot blocker, when 5 years ago he would have dunked with ease. He deserves an entire article here. But the bottom line is this: he's gotten a depleted Rockets team up to third place 3/4 of the way through the season in the most difficult conference any of us has ever seen. If he keeps it up through season's end, then his name does deserve to be mentioned in the original 5 that I pointed out earlier.


Now, let's get to the 5 true MVP candidates. These are the five we immediately think of, and rightfully so. Before I breakdown their pros and cons, let me first remind you of the 5 categories used to determine most valuable player. IN NO PARTICULAR ORDER:
1) Who statistically had the best season?
2) Whose team had the best season?

3) Who got the most out of his teammates (not who did the most despite his teammates)?

4) Who, relatively, is the most valuable player to his team?

5) Who is the most clutch player or who performed the biggest in the biggest and/or closest games?

I will rank the 5 players in each of the five categories.


Chris Paul: 21.3 ppg, 11 assists, 4 rebounds, 2.7 steals, 49 FG%. Hornets: 43 - 20.
I've often said of all the positive influences Michael Jordan had on the game of basketball, the one negative was that classic point guards became non-existent. Before MJ, kids who played point guard on their YMCA or school teams focused more on ball handling and passing than scoring. Coaches taught it more consistently. Little men wanted to be more like Magic or Stockton. But the MJ Effect changed everything. Every player under 6'4" wanted to be a scorer. They practiced shooting fade away jumpers or circus shots driving to the basket. Come to think of it, every player taller than 6'4" wanted to play like Michael too. If Kevin Garnett came along 25 years ago, his coaches would have told him to get his ass on the block or he'd be sitting next to them. No way would a Dirk Nowitzki be allowed to jack up a 2o footer from the top of the key on an iso with a man in his face and have that be called a "good shot" for him. Anyone above 6'9" played in the paint, or he simply wouldn't play.

That is what is so refreshing about CP3. He's the face of a revolution, the Reincarnation of the Classic Point Guard. Guys learning the game now are not watching MJ drop 40 every Sunday on NBC. They're being taught what a true point guard does, which is be the primary ball handler, make good decisions with the ball, be the coach on the floor, and run the team's offense while still being a scoring threat. These are the guys who watched Jason Kidd and Steve Nash growing up. For every Iverson and Arenas, there now is a Tony Parker or a Deron Williams or a Devin Harris.

Or a Chris Paul. If I'm starting a franchise and I get to have the team for the next ten years, my first pick is Lebron, followed by Dwight Howard, possibly Greg Oden, and then Paul. He's that good. 21, 11, and 3! From a 3rd year player! Are you kidding? He's looking like a combination of Isiah in the late 80's and Tim Hardaway in the early 90's, the only two classic point guards ever who could put up 20 and 10 out of habit. He consistently eats up the opposing team's point guard, including Nash and Parker and Baron and Bibby and Kidd (and he finally exorcised the demon that was Deron Williams last week).

Stats-wise he's earned MVP recognition. He's got the "team success" front covered too. 42 - 20 in the hardest conference ever. Most people thought they'd struggle to make the playoffs, not struggle to have the best record in the West. He's made everyone around him better. Peja has rediscovered himself in N'Awlins. He was wasting away in Sac-town and was completely lost in Indiana. He gets 3 - 5 open looks from 3 simply by his man collapsing on CP3's penetration. His shooting % is way up and he doesn't need to put up as many bad shots. David West has become an all-star power forward in a conference full of all-star power forwards. Tyson Chandler has become an olympian, from "bust" to "bad ass" in 1 1/2 seasons. Jannero Pargo is getting legitimate minutes for the first time in his career as a shooting guard because Paul sets him up for so many good looks. CP3 is by far the most important player on his team. In fact, you can make the argument that NO ONE in the league is more important to his team's success than Paul is to the Hornets. Everything is run through him, every play. Byron Scott totally trusts him on the floor. He's their most talented player, most exciting player, leader on and off the court, and the heart and soul of their team.

Of the 5 candidates, I have him 4th however. That's not really a knock on him. It's more of a compliment to the three I rank ahead of him. The biggest objection I have to CP3 winning the MVP is that he doesn't do it at both ends (yet). KG, Duncan, Kobe, and even Lebron, when forced to, can and do shut down the opposing player at their position. You might say, "But look at his steals. He's averaging almost 3 a game!" That's a misleading stat. Iverson has averaged more than 2 steals a game practically his whole career, and he lets more people get passed him than the backdoor bouncer at the Dresden in "Swingers". Yes, Paul usually outscores his opposing point guard, but it's still too close for comfort.

Overall analysis: 1-Stats) 3rd, 2-Team) 4th, 3-Teammates) 4th, 4-Value) 1st, 5-Clutch) 3rd

Kevin Garnet: 18.8 ppg, 9.8 rbs, 3.5 ast, 1.3 blk, 1.4 stl, 54 FG%, Celtics: 51-12

My favorite player in the league along with The Diesel. If only this guy was in his prime right now. How great would this Celtics team be? I imagine if you polled every basketball fan in the country on who their favorite player is, and told them they weren't allowed to vote for anyone on their favorite team, KG would probably win in a landslide.

Through the first half of the season, the Big Ticket had this award locked up. But then Lebron became Jordanesque and the Lakers, Hornets and Spurs all went on huge runs. And then he got hurt. These are the reasons why he's dropped out of the top 2 or 3 conversation. He's still up there though, and if the Celtics get 65 wins or more, it's going to be very hard to not give him the award.

The impact he's had on this team cannot be measured. 24 - 58 last year, as I'm writing this they are 51 and 12. The reason for this is, quite simply, Garnett. As much as I love Ray Allen's game, his influence has been far more tempered by the intensity of KG and the revitalized game of Paul Pierce. More importantly, they gave up an average of 99.2 p/pg last year. This year: 90.2, good for top 3 in the league. Don't tell me this is Jesus Shuttlesworth's doing. He's got worse ankles than James Caan by the end of "Misery" and usually guards the other team's scrub. But a nine point difference in one season? This never happens. It's almost impossible to comprehend. As is KG's influence.

He's turned Kendrick Perkins from a overweight headcase into an important role player. Perkins gets at least 1 or 2 open dunks or layups per game from feeds by KG, the best passing big man in the game today. Plus he's become a decent post defender, allowing KG to roam and get into passing lanes. Rondo is averaging double figures now, his confidence soaring. KG has taken him under his wing. He is in his face after every play, encouraging him or giving advice. Paul Pierce has become one of the best all-around players in the game. He's the go-to guy down the stretch and he's also developed into a lock down defender, something he was never known to do, or, more importantly, asked to do.

This is what KG does. He DEMANDS accountability from his teammates. Last year, if Pierce's man scored on him - no big deal. This year, if scored on, he's embarrassed, as is the rest of the team. The change in mentality is amazing. The "KG Impact" is bigger than anything since Barkley's arrival in Phoenix in the summer of '92 and Moses Malone's influence in Philly in '82. Both those players won MVPs in their first year with their new teams. More importantly, both those players took their teams to the Finals at the end of the season. Count on KG to to do the same.

The Celtics have the best record in the game, so he's got the team success factor covered. He's made everyone on the team better, including Rivers. (Whatever back room deal he and Ainge had established last season as they were giving games away more often than Bush gives away pardons to white collar oil criminals in order to get their hands on Oden, Rivers definitely seems to be more comfortable and interested this season than last.) The knocks against him are that his stats are sufficiently down from years passed. Injuries are a reason for that, as is there more capable scorers around him. And he's only 1 point and 1 rebound away from being a 20 and 10 guy once again. However, Pierce and Allen have been getting most of the looks down the stretch in close games, with Garnett appearing to be comfortable with handing them that responsibility. In Minnesota he'd be taking the last second shot. In Boston he's been setting the pick to free up Allen or Pierce. A true MVP doesn't do that. Plus, one could make the argument that Pierce is just as valuable to this team's success as KG, the evidence being they were 7 and 2 while he was injured. KG is still a top 5 candidate, but barely. (Side note: outside of seeing Erin Andrews spread eagle on your bed with the words "Enter here" written on her abdomen with an arrow pointing down, is there a sight any true sports fan would want to see more than KG clutching the O'Brian trophy with champaigne and tears flowing down his face a'la Michael Jordan in '91?)

Overall analysis: 1-Stats) 5, 2-Team) 1, 3-Teammates) 1, 4-Value) 5, 5-Clutch) 5

Tim Duncan: 19.8 ppg, 11.6 rbs, 1.9 blk, 3.1 ast, 50 FG%, Spurs record: 44-20

Timmaaayyyy!! The overall best player in the league this decade. One of the best players of all time. Winner of 4 championships. Only 31 years old. By the time his career is over, where will he rank on the list of all-time great centers (And don't tell me he's a power forward. He's been playing center since the day he arrived in the NBA. The Spurs started two centers, Duncan and Robinson, 2 small forwards - Sean Elliot and Mario Elie, and 1 point guard - Avery Johnson, on that '99 team)? With Kareem, Russell, and Wilt definitely ranked ahead of him. It's a battle between him, Shaq, Hakeem, and Moses for the last two spots in the top 5. If he wins another 1 or 2 titles, he could crack into the top 3 someday.

This year his stats are slightly down, but you can count on him still finishing as a 20 and 10 guy by the end of the season. But, as usual, his name has been left out of the MVP conversation. Of course, as usual, he has his team set up as favorites heading into the playoffs. The problem with Duncan is that he is just so damn consistent. The things he does get taken so for granted. He's like the SpellCheck. As I'm writing this I know, as much as I try not to, I'll probably misspell a few words. But there's a comfort level in knowing when I'm finished, SpellCheck will clean up my mistakes. I should be thanking God every single day that he created someone smart enough to make the SpellCheck. But I take it for granted after a while. That's what Tim Duncan does. He allows for Parker, Bowen, Finley, and Ginobli to gamble and jump passing lanes because they know they got TD backing them up. He's the SpellCheck. He's up there with Russell, Cowens, Mutombo, Ewing, and Hakeem as one of the best big man team defenders. Not to mention he's pretty much a shut down one on one man. Come crunch time, it's him guarding the Boozers, Amares, and Garnetts, not Oberto. (This might change with Kurt Thomas's arrival.)

Ginobli is having a career year, and he has Duncan to thank for that. He gets doubled more than any other player in the NBA. This includes Lebron, Kobe, and anyone else you want to throw at me. Along with Shaq and KG, he's one of the best passing bigs in the game, and guys like Ginobli and Parker know this. It's beautiful to watch them play because Duncan knows exactly where those two are going to be when the double comes. His dominance has allowed for the growth of Tony Parker, who is the second best point guard now behind Chris Paul, and Ginobli, who is the 3rd best 2 in the league behind Kobe and TMac. These two don't become the players they are today without the luxury of having been Tim Duncan's teammates.

Although he and Kobe are the two best players in the league this year, he probably won't get as many votes as Kobe or King James. Statistically he's doing fine and his team is second in the West. And he's definitely made his teammates better. But maybe that will come back to bite him now. Ginobli and Parker are so good that they can carry the team for long stretches with TD out and not skip a beat. Another interesting thing I've noticed is that Ginobli has become the go-to guy down the stretch. Where in the past, they'd dump it into Duncan, let him do his thing, and if the double comes they'd get an open look because they know TD will find them, now I'm seeing a lot more pick and role with Parker and Duncan and even more of Ginobli and Duncan, and it's been Ginobli getting those crunch time shots. A true MVP takes those shots. I love TD but he's 3rd on my list this year.

Overall analysis: 1-Stats) 4, 2-Team) 3, 3-Teammates) 3, 4-Value) 4, 5-Clutch) 4

Kobe Byrant: 28.2 ppg, 5.3 ast, 6.1 rbd, 2 stl, 35% 3-point, Lakers record: 45-20.











Lebron James: 30.9 ppg, 7.4 ast, 8.1 rbd, 1.9 stl, 1.1 blk, 49 FG%, Cavs: 37-29.

One of these two will win this award almost certainly. Unless the Rockets don't lose again for the rest of the season, in which case they'll have to give it to T-Mac, It's going to either Kobe or Lebron. Both are having incredible years. Trying to pick between the two is like trying to pick between DeNiro or Pacino. It's impossible to accomplish and almost sac religious to even try. So why bother? Instead thank God that you're alive right now and are able to witness their greatness. But for sake of argument and stupidity, I'm going to try to break them down one category at a time. God help me.

STATS) Lebron

Kobe is having a fantastic year. Most people have now declared him the best all around player in the league. And I agree, when you take into account his defense. Along with Artest, Battier, and Raja Bell, he may be the best one on one perimeter defender in the league. And with Ariza being injured and Luke Walton being white, Kobe is often asked to guard the opposing team's best perimeter scorer. And to do that and still put up 28+ is kind of Jordanesque. All that said, Lebron, statistically, is even more Jordanesque. In fact, only two players ever put up similar numbers: The late 80's Jordan and the early 60's Big O.

Oscar: '60-'61 - '65-'66: 30.45 ppg, 10.7 ast, 9.9 rbd. ('61-'62: 30.8 ppg, 11.4 ast, 12.5 rbd)

Michael: '86-'87 - '92-'93: 33.2 ppg, 6 ast, 6.4 rbd. ('88-'89: 32.5 ppg, 8 ast, 8 rbd)

We don't see these kinds of numbers often. That seven year stretch MJ had from his 37.1 point per game explosion he had in '87 till his first retirement in '93, you could count on him to give you 32, 7, and 7 just as much as you can count on Seinfeld to deliver a classic episode every week between its 4th season and it's 7th season. From the "Contest" episode to the season finale of Season 7 when George accidentally kills Susan and mourns by deciding to go get some coffee (poor Lilly), that was the best stretch of TV any sitcom has ever had. I truly believe Lebron is about to embark on a Seinfeld-esque streak. And the scary thing is he's only 23 years old. He'll be doing this for a while, people. The commercials are right; we are all witnesses to something special here. Lebron does everything for that team. He's pretty much unguardable, and in terms of physical talent, he's the best in the league.

I also want to mention that if he smartens up (and it will come with age), his stats should really increase quite a bit. He's shooting almost 50%, which is unheard of in today's NBA where shooting 45% is considered transcendent. MJ used to shoot 50+ percent every year and still average above 30. Lebron will be the first perimeter player to pull that off if he learns to discipline himself and not jack up 25 footers at the end of the shot clock. More of his shots should come from the post. At 6-8, 250, he should have a house built on the lower left block for him to live in, have barbeques, and throw parties. Once he realizes where his strengths lie, fuggedabodit, baby.

Clutch) Kobe

Kobe is the best clutch player since Michael. That's it, that's all. It's not a knock on Lebron. It's a compliment to Kobe. He's got ice in his veins in the 4th quarter. He and Sam Cassell are, I think, the only two players that are genuinely not the least bit frightened to take the final shot in the game. They have zero conscience. They might have missed their previous 25 shots, but in their mind, they're making that last one. Lebron definitely has an argument after he Jordaned the Pistons in last year's playoffs. And he's done the same to the Bulls and Wizards and Magic over the last few years. But Kobe's done it in the Finals countless times. He's got balls forged in the fires of playoff crunch time. He routinely leads the league in 4th quarter scoring. There is no one in the league today I'd rather have taking my final shot than Kobe, period.

Value) Lebron

Without Lebron, the Cavs would be the Grizzlies. That team is absolutely horrible. Not much more I can say really, other than if Ferry doesn't get his act together he won't be allowed to enter the state of Ohio after Lebron becomes a Brooklyn Net. Kobe's team has the best coach in the history of the game and a good mix of veterans and talented youngsters that can carry the team when Kobe is out.

Team) Kobe

The Lakers have the best record in the most competitive conference in the history of the NBA. The Cavs are only 8 games above .500 in one of the worst conferences in the history of the NBA. Lebron's tendency to dribble out the shot clock down the stretch and then try to go one on five in the closing seconds is not particularly conducive to winning games. That's partly Lebron's fault and partly Mike Brown's fault. But Kobe is the best closer in the game, and is still every bit as capable as Lebron at taking over and finishing a game down the stretch.

There are some interesting parallels from Lebron's Cavaliers to the Bulls teams of the '80s. Where Jordan had to do everything by himself for his first 3 or 4 years in the league, Lebron is faced with the same task. And where Michael had Magic as the standard in the league whom he had to topple, Lebron has Kobe. Even though, by the late 80's, people had come to accept MJ being the most talented player, everyone still considered Magic as the best player and a true winner. They didn't give Jordan the "true winner" label until he beat Magic in '91. Perhaps Lebron will need to do the same before he gets "true winner" credit.

Teammates) Kobe

A lot of lessons were learned following "The Great Disbanment of 1998" by then Bulls general manager, Jerry Krause. One was that we will never see another tandem like Scottie and Michael again. Another was that this might be the last great dynasty we will ever see. One more we be that Jerry "Humpty Dumpty" Krause would not be able to put a winning team back together again.

A few years went by and another lesson was taught to us. Whether or not we learned from it is still debatable. The lesson: Scottie Pippen and Michael Jordan are two of the most underrated players ever. Hard to believe, right? Especially due to all the accolades given to Lord MJ over the years. But it's true. They are two of the most underrated players ever to lace 'em up. The proof lies in the post '98 careers of every teammate they had during that run.

RODMAN: Played 23 games with the Lakers in '99 and then 12 with the Mavs the year after. By 2001, he was out of the league.

LONGLEY: Played two unproductive seasons with the Suns before being traded to the Knicks were he stayed 1 year before retiring. He never averaged more than 8.7 ppg.

WENNINGTON: Played 38 games with the Bulls in '99 before signing with Sacramento where he played 7 games before retiring.

BUECHLER: Played another 6 seasons with 3 different teams, never appearing in more than 66 games and never averaging more than 5.5 ppg.

CAFFEY: Played another 6 seasons, only making the playoffs once with Milwaukee as a bench warmer.

RANDY BROWN: Played one more season with the Bulls before going to Boston, where he played 3 more seasons, never averaging more than 4.1 ppg.

Ron Harper, Toni Kukuc, and Steve Kerr were the only players to have any kind of success post '98, and that was simply as marginal role players.

My point to all this is simple: Scottie's and Michael's supporting cast SUCKED. They were terrible. Pippen and Jordan carried those guys to new levels during those championship years, levels they never reached before or since. This ability, the ability to bring up your teammates' level of play, to demand their accountability, is every bit as important as a player statistics and winning percentage when determing most valuable player.

Applying this to today's race, it especially stands out as the major difference between Kobe and Lebron. Kobe makes his teammates better. Lebron does not. All of Kobe's teammates have improved since playing with him, from Farmar to Fisher to Luke Walton and particularly to Andrew Bynum. Bryant has demanded they get better. All of Lebron's teammates have not improved. In fact, if anything, they've gotten worse. Larry Hughes was a borderline all-star before coming to play with King James, where he was labeled a bust. Ilgauskas was a former all-star, and his numbers have gotten worse nearly every year since James came into the league.

Another way of looking at it is this. Look at the number of players remaining on the Cavs since Lebron was drafted in '02/'03. The answer: 1, Ilgauskas. Look at the number of players that have stayed with Kobe. Turiaff, Bynum, Mihm, Odom, Vujacic, and Walton have all been there at least 3 years. Plus Fisher actually came back to play with him. Now granted, they have a hall of fame coach that excels at putting his role players in a position to succeed. But ask yourself this: do you believe Andrew Bynum would have become the player he is today had he played with Lebron instead of Kobe. Look at the careers of Darius Miles and Dejuan Wagner. Where are they now?

Bottom line is this: Kobe could go out and average 35 a game like he did a couple years ago. He could put up Lebron numbers. But he knows, at this point in his career, he needs his role players playing well in order to win in the playoffs. Lebron hasn't learned how to do this yet. That is what makes Kobe Bryant better. And that is what makes him this year's MVP.

Lebron James - Overall analysis: Stats) 1, Team) 5, Teammates) 5, Value) 2, Clutch) 2

Kobe Bryant - Overall analysis: Stats) 2, Team) 2, Teammates) 2, Value) 3, Clutch) 1

What the Hell is an MVP?

With the NBA MVP race heating up faster than Kathleen Turner in "Body Heat," it's time we decide, once and for all, what truly is an MVP. It doesn't refer to the "BP," or best player. It doesn't refer to the "MPTP," or most physically talented player. And it definitely doesn't refer to the "Most Valuable Player to his Team" either. The MVP is, quite simply, the Most Valuable Player in the League. In other words, the guy who is having the best season.

There are 5 categories of which determining who had the best season relies on. 1) Who statistically had the best season? 2) Whose team had the best season? 3) Who got the most of his teammates (not who did the best despite his teammates)? 4) Who, relatively, is the most valuable player to his team? 5) Who consistently performs the best in clutch situations or in the biggest games?

It is very rare that the MVP is also the BP and the MPTP. As we know, the most physically talented player is rarely also the best player. And by "Best," I mean, if you're a GM/Head Coach, and it's the start of the season and you could pick one player in the entire league to try to win a championship this year, who do you pick? The main difference is the Best Player, though maybe not as physically gifted as the MPTP, still has the all-important "Mental Edge" making him the better of the two. In addition, it must be said that the Best Player is not often the MVP.

For example, A-Rod has been the MPTP for years and he's been the MVP three times. But I still would have rather had Jeter or Pujols or Ortiz many of those years before the 2007 Alex Rodriguez came along. It wasn't until last year that he became truly the Best Player in the league. The easiest way to tell the difference between who the Best Player is and who the true MVP is to ask yourself who is the best player as opposed to who had the best season. The answers are often different.

From '91 to '93, Lord MJ was all three (he should have beaten Sir Charles in '93 for MVP honors). Also from '96 to '98, he was all three (the playoffs proved he deserved it more than The Mailman in '97). This rarely happens. Michael Jordan was the most physically talented player, the best player, and the MVP (and should have been named as such) all those years.

MJ, as always, is only the exception. In 2000 and 2001 it happened with Shaq also (he should have beaten Iverson for MVP in '01). Duncan surpassed him as the MPTP in '02, also winning the MVP that year. But Shaq was still the BP and probably would have won MVP had he stayed healthy that year instead of missing almost 20 games (on his way to winning his 3rd straight championship, outplaying Duncan in the WCF along the way). Duncan had an incredible season and established himself as one of the top 3 or 4 players in the league. But he wasn't the "Best." That year, Shaq still had the mental edge on Duncan, even though Duncan had probably surpassed him physically. If I was picking one player to lead my team that year, I'm picking Shaq without hesitation. It wasn't until the following year that Duncan became the Best Player as well as the MVP (on his way to winning his 2nd championship), despite the fact that, at that point, he was probably surpassed by Kobe's development for MPTP.


Kobe and Duncan have swapped back and forth over the MPTP in the league since then (and probably until this year, with Lebron taking over that title). But despite Kobe maybe being more physically talented, he was never a better player than Duncan. Since '03, Tim Duncan has been the best player in the league, period. He's won 3 out of 5 championships. He should have won in '06 if Manu hadn't fouled Dirk. And he probably would have won in '04 if Derek Fisher hadn't hit that ridiculous fadaway on the inbounds pass in San Antonio with .4 seconds left. San Antonio would have gone on to beat the Lakers and probably would have beaten the upstart Pistons that year in the finals. It's amazing how influential these little plays can be.

Now, despite Duncan being the Best Player in the league for the last 5 years and Kobe Bryant being the Most Physically Talented Player for the last 5 years, only one of them has won the MVP since '03, the year Duncan won it. KG won MVP in '04, and he deserved it. That doesn't mean he was more talented than Kobe or better than Duncan. I still take Duncan that year as my first pick if I want to win a championship. But KG deserved the MVP for taking a miserable T-Wolves team to within 2 games of the Finals. (If Cassell hadn't gone down with an injury during that series and had the referees not called two of the most lopsided games in the Lakers favor that I've ever seen, they would have beaten that Lakers team.) The following years in '05 and '06, Steve Nash won it, deservedly. He was the Most Valuable Player in the league both those years, despite the fact that Duncan was still the Best and Kobe was still the MPTP.

Last year, Dirk was named MVP and he had a terrific year. But the league didn't look passed the notion of "best player on the best team should be the MVP." And therefore, nobody considered Duncan for MVP, despite the fact that he was the best offensive big man in the game and should have been beaten Camby for Defensive Player of the Year (he dominated Camby in their playoff series). He proved in the post-season that he was still the Best player in the league and should have been the league MVP.

This year's race is tighter than a Nun's a-hole and so far at least a handful of players can make a claim that they deserve it. But it's important to keep in mind what the MVP truly is, as opposed to who simply is the most physically talented player or who is the best player. They are rarely all the same. The MVP should go to the player having the best season, period.

Best Players, Most Physically Talented Players, true Most Valuable Players, and named Most Valuable Players since 1988, the year Jordan got his first MVP:

1988: BP - Magic Johnson, MPTP - Michael Jordan, true MVP - Michael Jordan, named MVP - Michael Jordan.

1989: BP - Magic Johnson, MPTP - Michael Jordan, true MVP - Michael Jordan, named MVP - Magic Johnson.

1990: BP - Michael Jordan, MPTP - Michael Jordan, true MVP - Michael Jordan, named MVP - Magic Johnson.

1991: BP - Michael Jordan, MPTP - Michael Jordan, true MVP - Michael Jordan, named MVP - Michael Jordan.

1992: BP - Michael Jordan, MPTP - Michael Jordan, true MVP - Michael Jordan, named MVP - Michael Jordan.

1993: BP - Michael Jordan, MPTP - Michael Jordan, true MVP - Michael Jordan, named MVP - Charles Barkley.

1994: BP - Scottie Pippen, MPTP - David Robinson, true MVP - Scottie Pippen, named MVP - Hakeem Olajuwan.

1995: BP - Hakeem Olajuwan, MPTP - David Robinson, true MVP - Hakeem Olajuwan, named MVP - David Robinson.

1996: BP - Michael Jordan, MPTP - Michael Jordan, true MVP - Michael Jordan, named MVP - Michael Jordan.

1997: BP - Michael Jordan, MPTP - Michael Jordan, true MVP - Michael Jordan, named MVP - Karl Malone.

1998: BP - Michael Jordan, MPTP - Michael Jordan, true MVP - Michael Jordan, named MVP - Michael Jordan.

1999: BP - Shaquille O'Neal, MPTP - Shaquille O'Neal, true MVP - Karl Malone, named MVP - Karl Malone.

2000: BP - Shaquille O'Neal, MPTP - Shaquille O'Neal, true MVP - Shaquille O'Neal, named MVP - Shaquille O'Neal.

2001: BP - Shaquille O'Neal, MPTP - Shaquille O'Neal, true MVP - Shaquille O'Neal, named MVP - Allen Iverson.

2002: BP - Shaquille O'Neal, MPTP - Tim Duncan, true MVP - Jason Kidd, named MVP - Tim Duncan.

2003: BP - Tim Duncan, MPTP - Kobe Bryant, true MVP - Tim Duncan, named MVP - Tim Duncan

2004: BP - Tim Duncan, MPTP - Tim Duncan, true MVP - Kevin Garnett, named MVP - Kevin Garnett.

2005: BP - Tim Duncan, MPTP - Kobe Bryant, true MVP - Kevin Garnett, named MVP - Steve Nash.

2006: BP - Tim Duncan, MPTP - Kobe Bryant, true MVP - Steve Nash, named MVP - Steve Nash.

2007: BP - Tim Duncan, MPTP - Kobe Bryant, true MVP - Tim Duncan, named MVP - Dirk Nowitzki.

2008: BP - Kobe Bryant, MPTP - Lebron James, true MVP - Kobe Bryant, named MVP - Kobe Bryant.

2009: BP - Kobe Bryant, MPTP - Lebron James, true MVP - ?, named MVP - ?